Asmongold Had Two Conspiracy-Adjacent Takes on September 17. The Internet Noted Both.
A gaming CEO defended mandatory crunch. Asmongold predicted the press would get it wrong. Then, separately, he wondered aloud whether Hasan's internet problems were an inside job.
On September 17, Asmongold surfaced two distinct takes on stream that r/LivestreamFail users flagged within hours of each other. One concerned the gaming press. One concerned a man named David.
The first: when the CEO of WarDogs publicly defended mandatory crunch, Asmongold reportedly predicted that gaming journalists would misrepresent the story, according to an LSF thread submitted by u/Disastrous-Swan5923. The thread did not specify which outlet or article Asmongold was anticipating, only that he expected coverage to mischaracterize whatever the CEO had said. Replies in the thread appeared divided, with some commenters treating the prediction as reasonable media skepticism and others framing it as reflexive anti-press positioning on Asmongold's part before any coverage had actually run.
The second take arrived in a separate thread, submitted by u/IronVeilPlays. Asmongold, per that post, pondered on stream whether an employee named David, associated with HasanAbi, had been paid to deliberately interfere with Hasan Piker's internet connection. The thread offered no additional context about what prompted the speculation or what incident involving Piker's internet Asmongold was referencing. Reaction in that thread leaned toward treating the segment as a bit, though several commenters engaged with it as though it were a sincere theory.
For the record, neither the crunch prediction nor the David speculation has been substantiated by documented evidence in the signal. The WarDogs journalism take is, at this stage, a forecast rather than a response to anything published. The David theory is, at this stage, a question Asmongold asked out loud.
What is documented is that both threads surfaced on the same day, and that both generated enough engagement to reach LSF's front page. Whether either reflects a coherent position or constitutes a segment is a distinction the threads do not resolve.
What happens next
Whether any gaming outlet publishes WarDogs crunch coverage that Asmongold then characterizes as a misrepresentation remains open. The identity of the internet incident involving Piker that prompted the David speculation has not been named in the signal. Asmongold has not, as of September 18, posted a YouTube video referencing either take.
💬 THE PEANUT GALLERY — 0 takes
LOG IN or MAKE AN ACCOUNT TO JOIN THE CHAT.
NO COMMENTS YET. BE THE FIRST TO SAY SOMETHING UNHINGED.